ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Translational insights into canine dorsal root ganglia cell types using cross-species comparisons.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain accounts for nearly half of owner-reported canine euthanasia decisions, yet dogs remain underutilized as a large-animal model for studying pain and developing translational therapeutics. Here, we present a canine dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cell atlas generated from six donors, representing five breeds, both sexes, and three spinal segments. Our dataset comprises 3,026 neurons and 11,734 non-neuronal cells and resolves 15 neuronal subtypes that map cleanly onto A- and C-fiber classes. We further identify eight major non-neuronal subtypes, including glial, vascular, and immune populations and characterize neuronal and non-neuronal expression of physiologically relevant neuropeptides, receptors, and ion channels. We identify region-specific differences in subtype composition between lumbar and sacral DRGs, with transcriptional programs suggestive of enhanced tactile-associated signaling in lumbar DRGs and heightened nociception-associated signaling in sacral DRGs. Cross-species comparisons reveal that canine DRG subtypes are broadly conserved with human and mouse, while also exhibiting canine-specific and canine-human shared molecular features relevant for translation. Together, this atlas serves as a valuable resource for understanding canine sensory neurobiology, comparing DRG organization across mammals, and leveraging dogs as a translational model for pain research and therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.