Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039404›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Social attachment shapes interbrain synchrony.

Kathleen Murphy, Liza E Brusman, Yevgenia Kozorovitskiy, Zoe R Donaldson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathleen MurphyDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Liza E BrusmanDepartment of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.
Yevgenia KozorovitskiyDepartment of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Zoe R DonaldsonDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-7905

Funding

Dynamic entanglements: the functional role and mechanistic basis of inter-individual neural synchronyU01NS131406 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI DONALDSON, ZOE REBECCA, KOZOROVITSKIY, YEVGENIA · 2023 to 2025
$4.2M
Investigating the role of correlated neural activity in pair bonding using prairie volesF31MH130143 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI MURPHY, KATHLEEN · 2022 to 2024
$104k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH130143NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS131406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural synchrony, or correlated neural activity across interacting individuals, scales with relationship quality in humans, yet how it evolves during social bond formation remains unknown. Using fiber photometry in monogamous prairie voles, we track prefrontal cortex synchrony across pair bond formation. Bonded voles show stronger synchrony with partners than strangers, mirroring human findings. A linear mixed model reveals that synchrony is jointly shaped by bond strength, inter-animal distance, and time since interaction onset, with relationship type modulating how each factor contributes. Using a machine-learning behavioral classification pipeline we developed for freely interacting voles, we demonstrate that the coupling between specific behaviors and synchrony depends on the nature of the dyadic relationship. These findings establish that neural synchrony is not a simple function of proximity or interaction time but is fundamentally shaped by relationship history-a conclusion with direct implications for understanding the synchrony in human social attachment.

Indexed as

bondinginterbrain correlationsynchronyvole

Identifiers

PMID42039404
PMCPMC13104831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.