Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039371›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Interoceptive NeuroEmpowerment Scale: a trauma-informed measure of adaptive state ownership.

Kate Truitt, McKenna E Walsh, Michelle R Dalton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kate TruittTruitt Institute, Pasadena, CA, United States.
McKenna E WalshTruitt Institute, Pasadena, CA, United States.
Michelle R DaltonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Interoceptive NeuroEmpowerment Scale (INES) is a trauma-informed clinical tool designed to track a person's moment-to-moment capacity to access and trust adaptive internal states. Rooted in contemporary neuroscience and systems memory theory, the scale offers a real-time, relational alternative to traditional affirmation or distress-based tracking tools. Rather than asking patients to endorse a belief, the INES invites them to rate how much of a chosen resilience state-such as calm, worthiness, or connection-feels internally available in that moment. This percent-based rating is designed to index the momentary accessibility and embodied accessibility of an adaptive internal state, reflecting the extent to which that state is experientially present and tolerable at a given time. Developed in response to stress-associated neuroplastic adaptations and documented negativity bias following trauma exposure, the INES is proposed as a structured method for pacing re-engagement with adaptive internal states within an individual's regulatory limits. Conceptually grounded in Hebbian plasticity, working memory processes, salience network function, and memory updating frameworks, the scale treats measurement as part of the therapeutic process. This paper outlines the theoretical rationale, proposed mechanisms, standardized administration guidance, and priorities for empirical validation necessary to evaluate the construct of adaptive state ownership.

Indexed as

adaptive state ownershipinteroceptionneuroplasticitysalience networkself-awarenesstrauma neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID42039371
PMCPMC13106559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.