ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Calcium modifying dedicated balloons: a contemporary review.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Calcified coronary lesions are a major challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), frequently leading to stent underexpansion, restenosis, and adverse events. While multiple technologies exist for plaque modification, there remains a critical need for clear guidance on the optimal selection and use of dedicated balloon-based devices. Summary: This review summarizes current evidence on scoring balloons, cutting balloons, and ultra-high-pressure (OPN NC) balloons and aims to define their specific role and indications in the treatment of calcified coronary disease. Particular attention is given to how lesion morphology, calcium characteristics, and procedural context influence device selection. Scoring balloons use external nitinol elements to create controlled focal stress, particularly effective in eccentric calcium. Cutting balloons incorporate microblades mounted on the balloon surface, allowing intimal incisions and fracture of concentric and mixed calcification or fibrotic tissue; repeated sequential inflations, as proposed in the RODIN-CUT technique, may enhance calcium disruption in a dose-dependent manner. OPN NC balloons, capable of inflations up to 35-40 atm, provide an effective last-resort option in undilatable lesions. Across devices, intravascular imaging plays a pivotal role in characterizing calcium morphology, guiding device selection and sizing, and confirming plaque modification. Conclusions: Calcium-modifying balloons provide predictable and versatile strategies for treating calcified coronary disease suitable both as a first-line option and as a complementary tool alongside intravascular lithotripsy or atherectomy. Device performance is tightly linked to lesion selection, procedural technique, and intravascular imaging guidance. An individualized, integrated, and morphology-tailored multimodality approach remains the most pragmatic strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.