ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Implantable venous access port placement in the upper arm of breast cancer patients with persistent left superior vena cava: a case series and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare congenital venous anomaly. Although implantable venous access port placement in PLSVC has been reported, the optimal technique, catheter positioning, and safety considerations remain uncertain. This study describes our experience in managing three breast cancer patients with PLSVC and proposes a safe and efficient approach for port placement. All three cases of PLSVC were identified among breast cancer patients undergoing implantable venous access port placement guided by intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-ECG). A negative P wave appeared on IC-ECG, and persisted as it advanced toward the predicted insertion length. These findings were reproducible on repeated catheterizations. To avoid excessive tip depth, the catheter was withdrawn by approximately 3 cm from the predetermined length. Postoperative X-ray and CT confirmed the final tip position at the T6 level. No functional impairment or catheter-related complications occurred during the entire course of treatment. Therefore, when placing a port from the left side, the presence of a negative P wave upon reaching the predetermined length may indicate PLSVC. Persistence of the negative P wave during further advancement, or the emergence of bidirectional P waves, should heighten suspicion for this anomaly. Postoperative X-ray and CT can confirm both the presence of PLSVC and the final tip position. Based on observed left-right predetermined length discrepancies in the normal population, withdrawing the catheter by approximately 3 cm from the predicted insertion length provides a useful reference. However, final confirmation of tip location should always rely on imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.