ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2026
The Analysis of Optometrist Primary Eye Care Professionals as a Specialized Practice across India's Different States.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optometrists play a pivotal role in preventing and managing vision impairment through the provision of comprehensive eye care services. In India, vision impairment remains a major public health challenge, largely driven by uncorrected refractive errors, cataract, and other avoidable causes. Despite recent regulatory advances, limited evidence exists on the scope and distribution of specialty optometry practices across Indian states. This study assessed the extent and composition of specialty optometry practices among optometrists across selected Indian states. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among practicing optometrists in six Indian states using a pre-validated, self-administered questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. Informed consent was obtained electronically. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics were computed to summarize practice patterns. Results: A total of 325 responses were received, of which 321 were complete and included in the analysis. All participants reported providing refraction services, with a high monthly workload. Specialty practices were less common, with contact lens practice reported by 69.5%, binocular vision services by 62.0%, and low-vision care by 61.0% of respondents. The average number of specialty cases managed per month ranged from 5 to 15. Marked inter-state variations in specialty practice were observed, reflecting disparities in workforce distribution and service availability. Conclusion: The findings highlight a substantial reliance on refraction-based services and an insufficient level of specialty optometry practice relative to population needs. Strengthening specialty training and expanding the optometry workforce beyond routine eye examination are essential to reduce avoidable blindness in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.