ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2026
Exploring Fingerprint Biometric Devices as a Source of Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biometric fingerprint systems, although effective for identification and security, can facilitate the spread of infections in hospital settings due to repeated contact by multiple users. Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are increasingly associated with bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas species, which are capable of surviving on inanimate surfaces, including fingerprint scanners. This study was conducted to determine whether biometric fingerprint devices can act as reservoirs for pathogenic microorganisms and to detect the presence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) along with their antibiotic susceptibility profiles. Methods: Samples were collected from biometric fingerprint devices installed in the hospital and medical college. The samples were cultured, and the isolated organisms were identified. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of the isolates was performed using an automated system (VITEK 2 Compact, bioMérieux). Results: The overall prevalence of pathogenic bacteria isolated was 17.7% (17/96). Among the pathogenic bacteria identified (n=17), 29.4% were Gram-positive cocci, while 70.6% were Gramnegative bacilli. The most common bacteria isolated were Serratia species (23.5%), followed by Acinetobacter species and Enterococcus species. Among Gram-positive cocci, Enterococcus species were the most frequently isolated organisms. Conclusion: In conclusion, fingerprint biometric devices may act as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant organisms and contribute to cross-transmission in hospitals. Contactless biometric devices are preferable; otherwise, regular disinfection, nearby hand sanitizers, and routine microbiological surveillance should be part of infection control audits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.