Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039307›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Audiology2026

Differentiating Superior and Inferior Vestibular Neuritis: Insights from an Integrated VEMP and vHIT Assessment.

Sejal Somani, Sharda Sarda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sejal SomaniSchool of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India.
Sharda SardaSchool of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vestibular neuritis (VN) is a peripheral vestibular disorder commonly associated with viral infections or vascular insults and may affect either the superior or inferior division of the vestibular nerve. Diagnosis is based on case history and clinical vestibular assessments, including cervical (cVEMP) and ocular (oVEMP) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). The video head impulse test (vHIT) is a recent advancement that enables canal-specific assessment of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), aiding in identifying nerve involvement. Purpose: This study aimed to compare and correlate vestibular profiles of superior VN (SVN) and inferior VN (IVN) using vHIT-derived parameters (VOR gain and corrective saccades) and VEMPs, and to explore VEMP tuning shift characteristics in patients with VN. Research Design: A prospective case review was conducted using purposive sampling of patients diagnosed with VN. Study Sample: Eighteen patients with VN (SVN: n = 10; IVN: n = 8) were evaluated through case history, pure-tone audiometry, cVEMP, oVEMP, and vHIT. SVN was defined by abnormal oVEMPs with preserved cVEMPs and IVN by reduced or absent cVEMPs with preserved oVEMPs. Intervention: No therapeutic intervention was administered; only diagnostic assessments were conducted. Data Collection and Analysis: VEMP responses at 500 and 1000 Hz were analyzed for tuning shifts. vHIT parameters included VOR gain and corrective saccades across semicircular canals. Mann-Whitney tests compared VOR gain, corrective saccades, and tuning shifts between groups. Spearman correlation assessed associations between VEMP and vHIT parameters. Results: No significant difference in VOR gain was found between SVN and IVN groups (p > 0.05). However, SVN patients exhibited significantly more corrective saccades in the lateral canal (p < 0.05). Tuning shifts were more frequent in IVN (50 percent), suggesting altered saccular frequency sensitivity. Significant correlations were found between saccadic metrics and VEMP amplitudes. Conclusions: Combined analysis of vHIT and VEMP, particularly including corrective saccade and tuning shift parameters, enhances the diagnostic precision in differentiating SVN from IVN. Clinical Relevance Statement: These findings support incorporating advanced vestibular tests, vHIT (VOR gain, corrective saccades), and VEMP (cVEMP, oVEMP) into routine clinical protocols to improve differential diagnosis, monitor vestibular integrity, and guide individualized management in patients with VN.

Indexed as

Head Impulse TestVestibular Evoked Myogenic PotentialsVestibular NeuronitisAdultAgedAudiometry, Pure-ToneDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReflex, Vestibulo-OcularSaccadescorrective saccadescVEMPiVNoVEMPsVNtuning shiftvestibular neuritisvHITVOR gain

Identifiers

PMID42039307
PMCPMC13105855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.