ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Audiology2026
Types of Evidence Synthesis Beyond Systematic Reviews in Evidence-Based Practice Publications in Audiology Research: A Tutorial.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence synthesis refers to structured literature reviews that follow established guidelines and are reproducible, such as systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and meta-analyses. The methodological expectations for evidence synthesis, and especially systematic reviews, have evolved and become more rigorous. Purpose: This tutorial will provide information about new and emerging types of evidence synthesis, as well as an introduction to the updated standards for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Research Design: Tutorial. Data Collection and Analysis: This paper gives a brief history of evidence synthesis, along with an overview of the current literature on best methods for various types of evidence synthesis appropriate for audiology research. A detailed description of current standards and methods in evidence synthesis is provided, as well as published examples of the various types of evidence synthesis research in audiology. Results: Evidence synthesis methods are presented, along with information about the process and steps for choosing the most appropriate method based on research needs. The expectations and benefits of the different types of methodology are introduced. Conclusions: Although systematic reviews are highly recognized and used within the field, the quality of systematic reviews can vary greatly. Understanding the different types of evidence synthesis methodologies, deciding how to choose the appropriate method for the research question, and reviewing the recognized international standards for systematic reviews will enable professionals to produce higher-quality research that can be used to guide clinical practice. Clinical Relevance Statement: Given the contributions of evidence synthesis to evidence-based practice (e.g., clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, position statements, etc.), this tutorial provides readers with guidance and resources for clinician and/or researcher teams to begin an evidence synthesis project that follows best practices. It also serves as an introduction for those seeking more information on evidence synthesis best practices and methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.