ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Immune profiling of T cells: A comparative analysis of single-cell TCR sequencing using 10X Genomics and Parse Biosciences platforms.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of the T Cell Receptor Sequence in Shaping T Cell Functional Fate.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful tool for characterising the immune landscape. Multiple technologies are available, each with distinct specificities and inherent biases. Here, we focus on two technologies-10X Genomics and Parse Biosciences-for the paired profiling of TCR and whole-transcriptome in T cells using matched patient samples. Both platforms generated high-quality data and captured comparable TCR clonal landscapes, with strong concordance for dominant clones. More genes were captured with Parse, including a broader range of non-coding genes and pseudogenes. Although average gene expression was highly correlated across the platforms, feature selection, which retains only the most informative genes, yielded different sets of selected genes. Additionally, many T-cell subset markers varied substantially between platforms. Genes enriched in Parse were typically longer and associated with naive/central-memory T-cell genes, whereas those enriched in 10X were shorter and often associated with cytotoxic/effector genes. These patterns are consistent with differences in capture chemistry. These findings highlight meaningful considerations for platform selection, which should be aligned with study objectives. Parse offers an advantage for studies prioritising a wider range of genes, while 10X may be the apparent choice for detailed characterisation of effector function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.