ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Real-world efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar as first-line therapy for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and methods: A total of 253 patients with HCC who received either TACE plus sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar (combination group, n=74) or TACE alone (monotherapy group, n=179) were included retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match patients. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of two groups were compared. Results: After propensity score matching (1:2), 65 patients in the combination group were matched to 100 patients in the monotherapy group. The ORR (63.1% vs. 40.0%, Conclusion: Compared to TACE monotherapy, TACE plus sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar showed significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS for intermediate-advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.