ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Increased sensitivity in identifying language-related functional connectivity using jackknife resampling analyses.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional connectivity (FC) analyses of task-based fMRI (tbfMRI) often rely on static correlation methods that average signal relationships over time. While widely used, these methods may miss transient but meaningful neural interactions. In this study, we investigated whether jackknife resampling-a technique that systematically omits one time point at a time-enhances sensitivity in detecting language-related FC networks during an auditory comprehension task. We analyzed surface-based FC networks in 172 healthy young adults from the Human Connectome Project. FC matrices were computed across 68 cortical regions of interest, and statistically significant edges were identified using Bonferroni correction. We compared FC networks derived from a traditional static correlation approach with those obtained using jackknife resampling, applying an edge consistency threshold to retain only the most stable connections across time points. The static method identified 75 significant language-related FCs. Jackknife-based analyses recovered all of these and revealed 24 additional connections or edges (eight left-hemispheric, five right-hemispheric, 11 interhemispheric;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.