Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039094›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

An evaluation of the efficacy of single-echo and multi-echo fMRI denoising strategies.

Toby Constable, Jeggan Tiego, Kane Pavlovich, Arshiya Sangchooli, Priscilla Thalenberg Levi, Bree Hartshorn, Jessica Kwee, Kate Fortune, Kate Thompson, Sam Brown and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Toby ConstableSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-6129
Jeggan TiegoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-6398
Kane PavlovichSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4459-9639
Arshiya SangchooliSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Priscilla Thalenberg LeviSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Bree HartshornSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jessica KweeSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kate FortuneSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kate ThompsonSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sam BrownSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
James McLauchlanSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nancy Ong TranSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rebecca O'NeillSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark A BellgroveSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alex FornitoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) is widely used to study brain-wide functional connectivity (FC). However, the resulting signals are highly noise sensitive, and the best strategies for mitigating this noise remains unclear. In 358 healthy individuals, we compared 60 multi-echo (ME) and 30 single-echo (SE) rsfMRI preprocessing pipelines across six measures of data quality and associated effect sizes in FC-based prediction models of personality and cognition (cross-validated kernel ridge regression). ME pipelines generally outperformed SE pipelines, but no single pipeline excelled at both denoising and behavioral prediction. Using a heuristic scheme to rank pipelines across benchmarks, ME optimum combination (OC) with ME independent component analysis (ICA), ICA-FMRIB's ICA-based Xnoiseifier (FIX), and with head motion, cerebrospinal fluid, and white matter and gray matter signal regression, performed best when only considering denoising efficacy metrics. ME OC with ICA-FIX and head motion parameter regression performed best when only considering behavioral prediction results. ME OC with Automatic Removal of Motion Artifacts (AROMA) ICA, head motion parameter regression and Regressor Interpolation at Progressive Time Delays (RIPTiDe) performed best when aggregating across all evaluation metrics. These results favor ME acquisitions but show that no single denoising pipeline should be considered optimal for all purposes.

Indexed as

fMRIKernel ridge regressionMethodsMotionMulti-echoPreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID42039094
PMCPMC13108510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.