Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039093›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain.

Varun Madan Mohan, Thomas F Varley, Anthony M Harris, Robin F H Cash, Caio Seguin, Andrew Zalesky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Varun Madan MohanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4740-5668
Thomas F VarleyThe Vermont Complex Systems Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3317-9882
Anthony M HarrisSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-2095
Robin F H CashDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2612-9470
Caio SeguinDepartment of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-6336
Andrew ZaleskyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-9908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the brain orchestrates the flow of information between its multiple functional units flexibly, quickly, and accurately remains a fundamental question in neuroscience. Multiple theories identify neural oscillations as a likely basis for this process. However, a lack of empirical validation of proposed theories, particularly at the whole-brain scale, has hampered consensus on oscillatory principles governing neural communication, limiting our understanding of a process central to perception and cognition and its integration into experiments and clinical applications. Here, we empirically validate previously proposed neural-oscillatory communication mechanisms in the human brain-specifically involving power and inter-areal phase coherence-at the whole-brain scale. We do this by estimating the dependence of inferred communication on oscillatory measures that have been theorized to facilitate communication, in source-localized resting-state magnetoencephalography recordings. We find that power and phase coherence in the alpha, beta, and high-gamma bands track communication better than others. Crucially, the relation between communication and oscillatory measures varied across regions, indicating spatial heterogeneity in routing mechanisms. Notably, power and coherence-based principles tracked communication patterns of unimodal regions better than those of transmodal regions. In sum, these findings suggest that the human brain implements regionally specific communication mechanisms with complex neural-oscillatory dependence.

Indexed as

CommunicationConnectomeMEGNeural oscillations

Identifiers

PMID42039093
PMCPMC13108498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.