ReviewJournal of blood medicine2026
From Splenectomy to Partial Splenic Embolization, Which is Better for Hereditary Spherocytosis?
Review in Journal of blood medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics and Technical Outcomes of Microballoon Catheter-assisted Partial Splenic Embolization.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hereditary Spherocytosis (HS), with characteristic red blood cells (RBCs), is a group of genetic hemolytic disorders that occur in an autosomal-dominant manner. It is clinically characterized by anemia, splenomegaly, jaundice, and mutations in key genes. Splenectomy is the standard treatment for HS. Alternatively, partial splenic embolization (PSE) balances efficacy and safety, making it a promising solution. To determine how to choose surgery and ensure correct management, we reviewed the indications, techniques, efficacies, complications, and progress of alternative solutions to reach a comprehensive conclusion. Core clinical dimensions between Splenectomy and PSE in the treatment of HS, including surgical indications, operative techniques, hemoglobin improvement, infection risk, immune function preservation, long-term complications and recurrence rate. PSE is better than Splenectomy. Furthermore, forefront-targeted drugs, precise embolization ranges, and multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions were reviewed. Collaboration requires multiple departments and family members. Through this narrative review, we hope to provide practical advice for long-term follow-up and emergency management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.