ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Effects of acute hypoxic exposure on multiple-object tracking ability of flight trainees.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute hypoxic exposure can threaten flight safety by impairing the cognitive function of civil aviation pilots. This study aimed to investigate the effects of acute moderate hypoxia on pilots' dynamic visual attention using a multiple-object tracking (MOT) paradigm. Methods: Twenty-nine male flight trainees were recruited to perform the MOT task while exposed to a simulated hypoxic environment. Their reaction time and accuracy in each trial were recorded. Results: When tracking four target disks, participants' accuracy was significantly lower under hypoxic conditions compared with normoxic conditions. Meanwhile, when tracking six targets, their reaction times significantly shortened. Discussion: The results indicate that hypoxia can lower the upper limit of multiple-object tracking capacity from four objects to three. Hypoxia appears to shift the speed-accuracy trade-off toward faster responses at the expense of accuracy. First-click response indicates that flight trainees with better tracking skills tended to display faster and more accurate first-click responses. The negative impact of hypoxia on participants varies between individuals and is more pronounced when tracking a larger number of objects. These findings provide a theoretical basis for improving the selection and hypoxic training of pilots flying at high altitude and for optimizing cockpit human-machine interaction interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.