ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Behavioral mapping of multisensory experience and engagement in accessible gardens: a case study of Xuanwu Lake Park, Nanjing.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that sensory stimulation in urban gardens can help improve people's behavioral performance and physical and mental health. Accessible gardens for people with visual impairments provide crucial settings for sensing outdoor environments and may support social integration and psychological restoration. This study uses the Xuanwu Lake Accessible Garden in Nanjing as a case. Users' perceptual behaviors were systematically documented through behavioral observation. Demographic and behavioral data for 1,167 users were recorded on base maps and grid sheets. Daily patterns of use were further stratified by behavior categories and users' profiles, and their relationship with the sensory-space type and behaviors was assessed with Chi-square test. In parallel, 15 semi-structured interviews with visually impaired participants were conducted under the Sensory Experience Enlightenment Protocol (SEEP), and thematic analysis in NVivo was used to characterize their positive and negative sensory experiences in the garden. Results indicated that the multisensory spaces in the accessible garden provided rich, discernible stimuli, and sensory elements were significantly associated with users' perceptual behaviors. Overall experiences among visually impaired participants were positive, with tactile and auditory dimensions most salient. This study provides empirical evidence to inform multisensory design in accessible gardens by identifying how sensory-space features are associated with behavioral engagement and self-reported experiences, thereby suggesting design opportunities that may support restorative experiences and social participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.