ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Towards a theory of human creativity sustained by embodied collective intelligence.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Creativity in human societies may be sustained not by isolated minds but by embodied, collective intelligence. Using music as a tractable model system, this paper reviews evidence that creativity depends on the dynamic tuning of uncertainty: moderate, time-varying surprise-often accompanied by interoceptive bodily sensations-can promote exploration, while interpersonal synchrony and social evaluation can stabilize and transmit what is new. Because creativity itself is value-neutral, its social consequences depend on the co-occurrence of ethics, morality, and empathy. This paper argues that ethical norms bound admissible deviation, and empathic perspective-taking-supported by bodily and physiological coupling-acts as a social form of precision weighting that increases (or decreases) the likelihood that novelty is admitted, reshaped, or rejected by a community. From these ingredients emerges field-level intelligence (FLI): a process in which groups preserve diversity, selectively integrate deviations, and maintain "just-right" uncertainty under partially connected social structures. Although music provides a high-resolution measurement sandbox, this paper articulates boundary conditions and testable predictions for other domains (e.g., scientific discovery, design, and everyday collaboration) and for human-AI co-creativity. This paper outlines an empirical agenda: operationalize FLI and social precision weighting, quantify uncertainty dynamics in embodied interaction, and identify network conditions that sustain socially shared creativity without overgeneralizing across domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.