ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Research on the structure and influencing factors of postgraduate students' sense of learning gain in sports science.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to construct a theoretical structure of the Sense of Learning Gain (SLG) for Sports Science postgraduates, develop a standardized measurement instrument, identify its key influencing factors, and propose pathways for enhancement. Methods: Utilizing a stratified sampling method, postgraduate students from multiple provinces across China participated in an online questionnaire survey, divided into a pilot study ( Results: (1) The final SLG Scale for Sports Science Postgraduates comprises 25 items across three dimensions: "Tangible Gains," "Capability Enhancement," and "Emotional Fulfillment," with a cumulative variance explanation rate of 57.253%. (2) The formal scale demonstrated excellent reliability (Total Conclusion: The developed scale proves to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring the SLG among Sports Science postgraduates in China. The SLG is co-influenced by multi-level factors, and targeted optimization of the social environment, interpersonal support, school resources, and individual development can effectively enhance it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.