ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Mapping interpersonal-to-cognitive pathways with suicidal ideation: unforgiveness-based moderators within the interpersonal theory of suicide framework.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicidal ideation among young adults is a significant public health concern. While the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (ITS) provides a robust framework, the role of unforgiveness-based coping responses to interpersonal transgressions remains under-specified. Specifically, how strategies like avoidance, self-dysfunction, and revenge relate to the strength of ITS associations requires clarification. We examined cross-sectional associations among thwarted belongingness (TB), perceived burdensomeness (PB), hopelessness (HL), and suicidal ideation (SI), and whether these associations varied by unforgiveness-related coping (avoidance, self-dysfunction, revenge) within a moderated serial mediation framework. Methods: Standardized questionnaires were completed by 205 university-affiliated participants in Hong Kong. Given the cross-sectional design and zero-inflated outcome data, SI was modeled with Bayesian hurdle lognormal regression. Competing structural specifications were compared using WAIC/LOOIC to evaluate model plausibility. Results: Model comparisons favored a serial specification over a common-cause model. PB was robustly associated with both the presence and severity of SI. Moderator analyses indicated that avoidance and self-dysfunction were associated with a stronger link between TB and PB. Revenge motivation showed a complex pattern: it was associated with heightened hopelessness but reduced likelihood of reporting SI. In this non-clinical university sample, this pattern may reflect a form of emotional externalization, temporarily deflecting internalizing distress outward rather than conferring stable protection; this interpretation remains conditional on the cross-sectional design and sample characteristics. Discussion: Unforgiveness-based coping strategies appear to be associated with distinct points in the interpersonal-to-cognitive sequence. The "deflection" effect observed with revenge motivation should be interpreted with caution, likely representing an unstable externalization response rather than adaptive protection. Conversely, avoidance and self-dysfunction are linked to entrenched interpersonal distress. Integrating unforgiveness-based coping into suicide risk assessment offers a more granular understanding of risk. These findings highlight the value of assessing coping styles in youth-serving settings, suggesting that brief screening and low-intensity supports targeting specific coping mechanisms may be valuable for suicide prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.