Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42039016›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Machine learning-driven model construction for automated classification of cognitive styles.

Xiangwen Wu, Jing Feng, Jianjun Ma, Yu Li, Jiuning Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiangwen WuDepartment of Education, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan, China.
Jing FengDepartment of Education, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan, China.
Jianjun MaDepartment of Education, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan, China.
Yu LiDepartment of Education, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan, China.
Jiuning SunDepartment of Education, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of cognitive styles is important for personalized learning environment optimization and human-computer interaction system design. Traditional self-report measures suffer from subjectivity bias, so this study developed a machine learning classification model based on objective physiological data. Focusing on the distinction between verbal and representational cognitive styles, the study collected eye-movement data from 85 participants in a standardized cognitive task via eye-tracking technology. We extracted multidimensional eye-movement features and systematically evaluated the classification performance of six machine learning algorithms: decision tree (DT), K-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN), plain Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and integrated learning model (EL). Experimental results show that all algorithms can effectively utilize eye movement features for cognitive style classification, with SVM performing optimally, after optimizing the parameters using the grid optimization method, achieving 82.1% classification accuracy (F1 = 0.715). The method proposed in this study provides a new way for non-invasive assessment of cognitive styles, which can be applied to real-time adaptive learning systems. The research results provide important insights into the development of personalization of educational technology, adaptive design of learning interfaces, and cognitive-perceptual computing systems, and provide valuable references for the fields of educational psychology and human-computer interaction research.

Indexed as

classification modelscognitive styleeye-tracking techniquesmachine learningverbalvisual

Identifiers

PMID42039016
PMCPMC13103944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.