Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038997›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Nature is nurture: a scoping review of nature exposure as an equigenic intervention on children's psychological health.

Keira I Denker, Andrea Faber Taylor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keira I DenkerDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Andrea Faber TaylorDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research indicates that exposure to nature has positive effects on the mental health and psychological development of children. Children from less advantaged groups are in particular need of support in these domains, often experiencing poorer mental health and delays in psychological development. Thus, recent research has begun exploring the potential for nature experiences to have an "equigenic effect" on children's psychological health, boosting disadvantaged groups to achieve outcomes similar to advantaged groups. This scoping review presents a light review of the literature examining equigenic effects of nature exposure on health in adults and children and a deeper analysis of studies focused on children's mental health and psychological development. A search was conducted in EBSCO, PubMed, and Scopus, and a total of 123 empirical articles were included in the review after screening. The results reveal a growing body of evidence of an equigenic effect of nature exposure for adults and children; fewer studies, however, have focused on children. Among 24 studies comparing disadvantaged to advantaged children (ages 0-18), 19 of them demonstrated at least one positive finding in support of equigenesis, but there were also mixed findings. Themes in the literature regarding nature exposure and possible mechanisms underlying the potential equigenic relationship between nature exposure and children's psychological health are explored. Future research suggestions and implications for increasing nature exposure in children's lives through daily routines, nature-based learning, and improving equitable access are also discussed. This review presents evidence that exposure to nature may be an effective intervention to specifically support children living with disadvantage, promoting greater equity in psychological well-being.

Indexed as

child developmentequigenesisgreenspaceliterature reviewmental healthnature exposurepsychological developmentsocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID42038997
PMCPMC13105929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.