ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Age-Stratified Modeling of Clinical Heterogeneity in Polycystic Ovary Morphology Using Ultrasound-Based Machine Learning.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to employ machine learning for automated age stratification in patients with polycystic ovary morphology (PCOM) and to clarify the age-specific contributions of key clinical characteristics, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy. Patients and Methods: A total of 192 ovaries with corresponding clinical and ultrasound data were analyzed. Automated age stratification was performed using the K-means unsupervised clustering model along with the elbow method. XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithms were applied to compare full and selected feature sets. Model performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation with metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC), validating the stratification robustness and feature selection strategy. Results: Automated age stratification categorized PCOM patients into three distinct age groups. A stable positive correlation was observed between ovarian volume and follicle count across all strata; however, key diagnostic drivers varied significantly by age. Beyond ovarian volume, follicle count, and BMI, the 18-22 years group was primarily influenced by menstrual cycle phase. The 23-29 years group was characterized by the number of pregnancies and the ovarian stromal artery blood flow RI. In the 30-40 years group, the ovarian stromal artery blood flow S/D ratio and the number of live births showed increasing importance. Conclusion: This study highlights the differential role of age-sensitive indicators in ultrasound-based diagnosis of PCOM and provides a framework for more personalized diagnostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.