ReviewPediatric investigation2026
Six artificial intelligence innovation strategies applied to autism spectrum disorder research: A narrative review.
Review in Pediatric investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence, autism care, and health equity: a public health narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in social communication and restricted behaviors. Traditional assessment and intervention methods rely heavily on subjective and time-consuming approaches, which limit their clinical impact. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer transformative opportunities for ASD research and practice. This narrative review proposes six AI-driven strategies that address six core research challenges: uncovering causal mechanisms, modeling dynamic neurodevelopment, integrating multimodal data, individualized computational modeling, collaborative learning across institutions, and enhancing social training. We highlight the potential of causal inference to clarify gene-environment interactions, spatio-temporal graph neural networks to capture neurodevelopmental heterogeneity, and multimodal fusion for unified representation learning. Digital twin technologies enable personalized brain modeling and neuromodulation optimization, while social brain reverse engineering and federated learning frameworks support computational hypothesis generation and privacy-preserving collaboration, respectively. Large language models further facilitate context-aware social interventions. We also discuss key challenges-including data heterogeneity, interpretability, ethics, and clinical translation-and outline directions for building a more precise, human-centered research paradigm. This review aims to move beyond incremental tool improvements toward reconstructing scientific paradigms, thereby accelerating the effective translation of AI innovations into clinical ASD applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.