ArticleNursing research and practice2026
Functional Outcome and Independence Among In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in South India: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Outcome and Independence Among In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients in South India: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has a strong effect on the prognosis and recovery of the patients. However, there is no standardization or Core Outcome Set for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. The main aim of the study is to assess the impact of CPR duration on functional outcome, survival, and the level of independence among cardiac arrest patients. Methods: For this observational study, 121 patients were selected from two tertiary hospitals in South India. Data were collected from patients during the event of cardiac arrest with functional outcome and level of independence measured immediate post-CPR, Day 30, and Day 90 using standardized tools, namely, cerebral performance category and Katz index tool for the level of independence. Results: The mean and median age was 62.49 ± 13.18 and 65 years (IQR, 54-73 years), respectively, with 89 (73.6%) male patients. At the end of CPR, 55.3% of patients achieved ROSC and with a mean and median CPR duration of 18.97 ± 14.7 min and 15 min (IQR, 10 and 26 min), respectively. Overall mortality rates were 33.8% immediately following CPR, 56.1% by Day 30, and 58.67% by Day 90, with an overall survival rate of 41.3% at 90 days. Immediately post-CPR, 95% of patients were in an unfavorable neurological state; this proportion improved to 37.19% by Day 30, with no significant further improvement observed by Day 90. Level of independence demonstrates that 83.7% of the patients were dependent during the immediate post-CPR period with improvement to partial independence among 84.9% of patients by Day 30. The mean score of favorable and unfavorable outcome on Day 90 was 1.02 and 4.93, respectively. The mean score of dependency and partially dependent on Day 90 among the survivor was 0 and 4.78, respectively. The predictors are ROSC, use of life-saving drugs, and CPR duration. Conclusion: Utstein reporting system must be integrated for cardiac arrest patients. Cardiac resuscitation and termination must be based on established policy and guidelines to maintain neurological integrity to sustain the quality of life during the post-CPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.