ArticlePreventive oncology & epidemiology2025
Examining implementation strategies to reduce disparities in lung cancer screening uptake by state Medicaid expansion status: a scoping review.
Article in Preventive oncology & epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) has reduced lung cancer mortality by 20%, yet uptake in the U.S. remains low, especially among underserved populations. We evaluated implementation strategies designed to reduce disparities in LCS uptake based on race, ethnicity, income, and rurality and examined trends by state Medicaid expansion status. Methods: We conducted searches in MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. We screened primary studies and extracted data with assistance from four reviewers in Covidence in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were assessed for study design, intervention type, target population, etc. and stratified by state Medicaid expansion status. Results: Our review included 37 studies encompassing patient navigation, community outreach, and decision aids. Patient navigation was prevalent in both groups of states, whereas community-based approaches were more common in Medicaid non-expansion states. Most interventions showed some improvement in uptake of LCS, though the degree of impact varied across studies. Conclusion: This review demonstrates the nuanced landscape of effectiveness and challenges with addressing LCS disparities. A wide range of strategies showed some effectiveness and barriers to uptake varied depending on context, underlining the need for tailored strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.