ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2026
DermIDS: Dermatology imaging data structure for scalable and interoperable AI systems.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dermatologic imaging has been rapidly expanding, with over 70% of related PubMed articles published since 2016 and over a million images across international research challenges and large-scale datasets with skin images. To improve data quality and usability, standardizing dermatologic imaging data for non-protected health information (non-PHI) research systems is essential. While the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) has advanced standards in skin imaging, the field lacks a generalizable infrastructure to organize and describe imaging data for non-PHI research systems. This results in inconsistently labeled, heterogeneous datasets that hinder data integration, scalability, and interoperability. To address this gap, we propose the Dermatology Imaging Data Structure (DermIDS), inspired by the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) for neuroimaging. This structured framework aims to improve usability across datasets, reveal metadata gaps, and enable scalable artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML)-ready workflows. To illustrate this system, we curated and processed 1,000,692 images with DermIDS. We demonstrate that DermIDS (1) supports multimodal photographic data acquired from clinical photography, general photography, dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, and surface 3D imaging; (2) facilitates image-specific technical and clinical metadata organization; and (3) streamlines quality control and harmonization. Across all images, 1,256 unique metadata features were identified. However, 70% of clinical metadata features and 98% of technical metadata features were present in less than 100k images, highlighting key gaps and demonstrating the utility of DermIDS in revealing inconsistencies and opportunities for standardization. Our work supports large-scale analysis and harmonization, laying the foundation for AI/ML-ready workflows to advance dermatologic imaging research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.