Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038895›Full record

ArticleGalen medical journal2025

Lifestyle Experiences and Coping During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study from Saudi Arabia : Coping During Pandemic.

Mahmoud Abdulrahman Mahmoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Galen medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mahmoud Abdulrahman MahmoudDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud University, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted significant lifestyle changes worldwide. Despite extensive research on negative impacts, there's a gap in understanding positive transitions; thus, this study explores adaptive behaviors and coping strategies during the pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study recruited Saudi residents aged 18-70 via social media. Data collected through an electronic survey tool was analyzed using SPSS, focusing on demographic, health-related, and research-specific responses. Coping behaviors were interpreted using Lazarus and Folkman's model and Carver's Brief COPE framework. Results: Among 3,508 participants, 38.0% engaged in language learning and 55.6% read books or listened to audiobooks at a frequency of 1-3 times per month. Home cooking was reported by 79.2%, and 34.8% engaged in daily remote social interactions. Gender and nationality significantly influenced coping behaviors: reading books or audiobooks was more common among females (P0.001) and non-Saudis (P0.001), while exercising 2-4 days per week was also more prevalent among females (P=0.013). Programming interest was significantly higher among males and Saudi participants (P=0.035). Conclusion: Study Findings show that participants adopted a variety of adaptive coping strategies, such as book reading, exercise, social interaction, and engagement with online content. Framing these behaviors through established psychological coping models enhances understanding of their role in mental well-being. These findings can inform public health strategies to promote positive coping mechanisms and support mental well-being in Saudi Arabia and similar contexts.

Indexed as

Coping StrategiesCross-sectional StudyLifestyle ChangesMental Well-beingPandemic ResponseSocial Media Recruitment

Identifiers

PMID42038895
PMCPMC12503025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.