ArticleGalen medical journal2025
Management Protocols for Spinal Injuries in Adult Patients: A Clinical Guideline : Management Recommendations for Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries.
Article in Galen medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This research aimed to elucidate and establish management recommendations for patients with spinal cord injuries, tailored to the characteristics of Iranian society, through an exploratory mixed-methods study. Materials and Methods: The present study was executed in three phases. The initial phase was conducted to identify and elucidate the principal recommendations for the management of spinal cord injuries, comprising two sub-phases: a systematic review and a qualitative guided study. In the second stage, management recommendations were developed by integrating the findings from the first stage, and in the third stage, the clinical guide was prioritized and validated through two rounds of the Delphi method. Results: During the initial phase of the study (qualitative-review phase), 781 codes were derived from interviews with specialists in emergency medicine and neurosurgery, which were subsequently consolidated into six categories. During the second phase of the study, which involved the preparation of the primary draft, a review of pertinent texts was conducted, and researchers assessed 23 chosen clinical guidelines. In the third phase of the study (combination), the findings from the preceding two phases were integrated, and the questionnaire developed by 27 relevant experts was evaluated, culminating in the creation of the final clinical guide. Conclusion: This clinical guide, encompassing six categories-Pre-hospital, Immobilization, Diagnostic Imaging, Pain Management, Medication Recommendations, and Surgical Intervention-has been developed and compiled for the utilization of physicians in the emergency departments of hospitals in Iran.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.