ReviewGalen medical journal2025
Transcranial Brain Stimulation for Neurodevelopmental Disorders : Neuromodulation and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
Review in Galen medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are characterized by cognitive, behavioral, and emotional challenges that significantly impact quality of life. Despite advances in pharmacological and behavioral interventions, many individuals exhibit partial or limited responses, highlighting the need for innovative therapeutic strategies. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, particularly transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), have emerged as promising approaches to modulate neural circuits underlying these conditions. Beyond neural modulation, these techniques offer potential clinical benefits, such as improving cognitive and behavioral outcomes in individuals with NDDs, thereby addressing treatment gaps in conventional therapies. While TES primarily alters cortical excitability through electric fields, TMS induces direct neuronal firing via magnetic fields, allowing distinct applications tailored to specific conditions.This review examines the mechanisms, applications, and limitations of TES, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and TMS, including repetitive TMS (rTMS) and theta-burst stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.