ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026
Weakly supervised forest canopy extraction and multi-dimensional joint canopy entropy for quantifying canopy structural complexity using large-scale forest UAV LiDAR data.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canopy Structural Complexity (CSC) is a key structural attribute for evaluating forest ecological functions and health, with accurate canopy extraction serving as the prerequisite for its quantification and the basis for improving metric reliability and elucidating spatiotemporal canopy dynamics. However, existing canopy extraction methods generally rely on large-scale fully labeled point cloud datasets, which are often impractical for large-scale Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) LiDAR forest surveys. To address this limitation, we propose a weakly supervised canopy extraction strategy that relies on a limited number of labeled plots. By incorporating a pseudo-label generation strategy and a data-augmentation-based consistency self-supervised constraint, the method effectively improves segmentation performance in unlabeled scenarios. Furthermore, we introduce a multi-dimensional joint canopy entropy index that integrates both global and local canopy features, combining projection-based global canopy entropy with graph-based local canopy entropy to provide a more comprehensive CSC quantification. Experiments were conducted using three labeled plots as the training set and a held-out labeled plot for quantitative evaluation, with numerous unlabeled plots used for qualitative generalization analysis. Results showed that on the labeled test plots, the proposed weakly supervised strategy achieved 85.37 % mIoU and 92.64 % OA, surpassing the best-performing fully supervised method. Visual comparisons in real, unlabeled forest scenes demonstrate that the proposed method maintains clear boundaries between canopy and non-canopy regions, even in areas with significant topographic variation, fragmented canopy, or complex structures, while effectively suppressing false positives in ground and low-vegetation areas. The proposed multi-dimensional joint canopy entropy, when applied to the predictions of the weakly supervised canopy extraction strategy, successfully quantified the CSC using large-scale, unlabeled UAV forest LiDAR point clouds. It yielded results consistent with ecological priors and exhibited robustness under varying levels of point cloud sparsification. Based on normalized scores across three evaluation metrics, the proposed index achieved a score of 0.76, outperforming several commonly used CSC quantification indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.