ReviewPlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026
Integration of LLMs and VLMs in plant stress phenotyping: From trait recognition to decision support.
Review in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with Vision-Language Models (VLMs) holds transformative potential for plant stress phenotyping, enhancing high-throughput crop monitoring, trait identification, and decision support. Traditional phenotyping methods, often reliant on manual assessments and task-specific Machine Learning (ML) models, face persistent limitations in scalability, adaptability, and contextual interpretation, especially under complex and overlapping stress conditions. VLMs address these challenges by combining deep visual recognition with contextual reasoning, enabling real-time analysis of multimodal inputs such as high-resolution imagery, agronomic text data, and environmental sensor readings. Complementarily, LLMs contribute to text mining, semantic annotation of trait descriptors, and the integration of external knowledge via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), thereby enhancing the interpretability and adaptability of phenotyping workflows. This review critically evaluates the emerging role of integrating LLMs with VLMs in plant stress phenotyping, highlighting their applications in visual trait recognition, knowledge extraction, and autonomous decision-making. We synthesize current advances and identify key challenges, including data quality, domain-specific generalization, model transparency, and equitable access to AI technologies. As one of the first comprehensive reviews on this topic, we propose a forward-looking framework that integrates LLMs, VLMs, and RAG systems to enable scalable, explainable, and user-centric phenotyping solutions. This interdisciplinary convergence offers a promising pathway toward sustainable and resilient AI-driven agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.