Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038791›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026

Innovative 3D photosynthetic trait assessment of slash pine using drone-LiDAR fusion and machine learning algorithms.

Ruiye Yan, Yeqing Peng, Yanjie Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruiye YanResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, 311400, Zhejiang, China.
Yeqing PengMatou State-Owned Forest Farm, Jing County, Xuancheng, Anhui, 242000, China.
Yanjie LiResearch Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou, 311400, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate, spatially explicit quantification of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) in tall conifer plantations is essential for productivity modelling and breeding, yet standard nadir-view optical UAV imagery yields only two-dimensional surface estimates. We developed an unmanned aerial workflow that fuses centimeter resolution LiDAR point clouds with five band multispectral imagery to produce a three-dimensional voxelized canopy structure in which top-of-canopy multispectral reflectance values are propagated downward within each vertical column. Ground measurements of fPAR and chlorophyll fluorescence were collected contemporaneously and used to calibrate Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Partial Least Squares Regression models built from 14 spectral indices. Random Forest explained 84 % of fPAR variance (RMSE = 0.12), outperforming alternative algorithms. Application of the trained Random Forest model to the voxelized canopy (0.01 m × 0.01 m × 2 m) across 28 ha generated three-dimensional fPAR maps that revealed a 26 ± 4 % increase from lower to upper crowns and a seasonal shift of up to 9 %. Compared with conventional plot-level inversion, the workflow significantly reduced field labour and improved prediction accuracy. The fusion pipeline provides a species-specific tool for high-throughput phenotyping, precision silviculture, and genomic selection in slash pine plantations under clear-sky conditions (solar zenith angle 20-30°); transferability to other sites, species, or illumination conditions requires further validation.

Indexed as

Machine-learningPrecision forestrySlash pineUAV–LiDAR fusionVoxel-level fPAR mapping

Identifiers

PMID42038791
PMCPMC13109572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.