Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038788›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026

Deep learning for sorghum yield forecasting using uncrewed aerial systems and lab-derived imagery.

Md Abdullah Al Bari, Aliva Bakshi, Jahid Chowdhury Choton, Swaraj Pramanik, Trevor D Witt, Doina Caragea, Scott Bean, S V Krishna Jagadish, Terry Felderhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Md Abdullah Al BariDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Aliva BakshiDepartment of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Jahid Chowdhury ChotonDepartment of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Swaraj PramanikDepartment of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Trevor D WittDepartment of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Doina CarageaDepartment of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Scott BeanCenter for Grain and Animal Health Research, ARS-USDA, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
S V Krishna JagadishDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Terry FelderhoffDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The AI revolution, advanced Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), and open-source platforms have enabled Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms to rapidly and accurately extract phenotypic features from imagery. Such advancements have led to phenotypic digitization and made rapid yield forecasting possible. Yield predictions are critical to assess the merit of genotypes to propel cultivar development. This trial followed a three-replicated Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 36 diverse sorghum genotypes in 2023 at Ashland Bottoms, Kansas. The field images were captured 6 m above using a DJI M300 drone at 90° nadir and 45° oblique angles. This research trained YOLO and Faster R-CNN (Detectron2) models to harness yield attributes from UAS field and lab images. The YOLO models outperformed the Faster R-CNN in detecting sorghum panicles, achieving a mean average precision at 50 % IoU (mAP@0.50) scores of 0.92-0.98, compared to 0.61-0.89 for Faster R-CNN. Panicle detection from field imagery showed a linear correlation of 0.86 with ground truth field panicle counts. Lab imagery analyses measured panicle area, seed counts, and seed area with correlation coefficients of 0.79, 0.94, and 0.25 with respective ground truth observations. Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Decision Tree Regression (DTR) were used to predict yield with correlation coefficients of 0.74, 0.71, and 0.78, respectively, and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis revealed panicle seed count as the primary driver of yield prediction. We observed YOLO models are well-suited for extracting yield-predictive features from pertinent images. Such features can then be incorporated into ML regression models to predict yield

Indexed as

Computer Vision, YOLO, Faster-RCNNDeep LearningExtracting Yield FeaturesSorghum Yield Prediction using Machine LearningUnmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Imagery

Identifiers

PMID42038788
PMCPMC13109310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.