ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2026
Deep learning for sorghum yield forecasting using uncrewed aerial systems and lab-derived imagery.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The AI revolution, advanced Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), and open-source platforms have enabled Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms to rapidly and accurately extract phenotypic features from imagery. Such advancements have led to phenotypic digitization and made rapid yield forecasting possible. Yield predictions are critical to assess the merit of genotypes to propel cultivar development. This trial followed a three-replicated Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 36 diverse sorghum genotypes in 2023 at Ashland Bottoms, Kansas. The field images were captured 6 m above using a DJI M300 drone at 90° nadir and 45° oblique angles. This research trained YOLO and Faster R-CNN (Detectron2) models to harness yield attributes from UAS field and lab images. The YOLO models outperformed the Faster R-CNN in detecting sorghum panicles, achieving a mean average precision at 50 % IoU (mAP@0.50) scores of 0.92-0.98, compared to 0.61-0.89 for Faster R-CNN. Panicle detection from field imagery showed a linear correlation of 0.86 with ground truth field panicle counts. Lab imagery analyses measured panicle area, seed counts, and seed area with correlation coefficients of 0.79, 0.94, and 0.25 with respective ground truth observations. Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Decision Tree Regression (DTR) were used to predict yield with correlation coefficients of 0.74, 0.71, and 0.78, respectively, and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) analysis revealed panicle seed count as the primary driver of yield prediction. We observed YOLO models are well-suited for extracting yield-predictive features from pertinent images. Such features can then be incorporated into ML regression models to predict yield
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.