ReviewCureus2026
Exploring the Characteristics and Outcomes of Centenarian Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units: A Systematised Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Centenarians are among the most rapidly expanding age demographics in Australia and are being admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at historically high rates. Nonetheless, the current literature has not investigated the outcomes and pre-admission characteristics of this vulnerable population in sufficient depth to meaningfully guide clinical practice. This narrative literature review aimed to synthesise the existing literature on ICU admissions in centenarians and identify previously reported pre-admission characteristics and outcomes. This systematised narrative review employed a structured search strategy guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) principles and used the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework to aid in defining the scope. A systematic search strategy was performed in Medline (Ovid interface), with inclusion criteria aimed at capturing primary research that investigated centenarians admitted to critical care and was published in English. Covidence was used to screen articles via title, abstract, and full-text review. Key data were extracted from studies into a predetermined table. Analysis of the current literature suggested that although clinicians often perceive ICU admission of centenarians as a high-risk practice, certain patients may recover to their baseline functional levels. However, the existing literature is scant and limited by small sample sizes. Substantial knowledge gaps exist, particularly regarding the predictors of successful ICU outcomes, functional recovery, and quality of life outcomes. This narrative review demonstrates the need for large-scale, multicentre observational studies to influence clinical decision-making regarding centenarians in the ICU and to guide critical care triage policies for centenarians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.