ArticleCureus2026
A Case of Clinical and Viral Rebound Following Completion of a Five-Day Course of Ensitrelvir for COVID-19.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensitrelvir inhibits the 3-chymotrypsin-like protease of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and accelerates viral clearance and symptom improvement through its potent antiviral activity. Reports of rebound after ensitrelvir treatment are scarce. This report presents a case of a healthcare worker in her 50s who had no significant underlying conditions. As a close contact, she underwent nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing after her sister was diagnosed with coronavirus disease. The test result was positive with a cycle threshold (Ct) value of 31.97 by using Cobas® liat. Ensitrelvir treatment was initiated because of a slight sore throat, and rapid improvement was observed starting the following day. Treatment was completed on day five. Examination on day six indicated that the symptoms had resolved. However, the sore throat recurred on day seven, antigen levels increased again, and fever and cough developed on day eight. On day nine, a Ct value of 16.6 was noted, suggesting a strongly positive result and rebound. She received five vaccine doses and had markedly high levels of anti-S immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies, but her anti-N IgG antibodies were negative, indicating that she had a normal immune response and had not been infected with COVID-19. Her illness was mild, and symptoms peaked on day 11, without additional treatment. This case strongly suggests viral rebound and symptom relapse after ensitrelvir administration. Therefore, caution is warranted, as rebound may occur after ensitrelvir treatment, similar to that after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.