ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
"Being treated as the expert:" A blueprint for a community advisory board approach to elevate the voice of people with living experience with substance use in academic research.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: "Being treated as the expert:" A blueprint for a community advisory board approach to elevate the voice of people with living experience with substance use in academic research - ERRATUM.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Researchers have traditionally engaged Community Advisory Boards (CABs) to meaningfully involve community members in the research process. However, CABs are often formed only after a grant is funded, leading to criticisms of functioning merely as "ethical approvers." For substance use researchers, the inclusion of people with living experience (PWLE; current experience with drug use) across all stages of research is especially important as they have historically been the experts in the needs of their community. Methods: In response to this need for community engagement in research, the University of Kentucky, in partnership with a local recovery community center (RCC; Voices of Hope), established the Survivors Union of the Bluegrass (SUB). The SUB is a stand-alone CAB (i.e., not tied to any particular research study) comprised of PWLE. Biannually, the SUB leadership team conducts quality improvement process evaluation focus groups with SUB members. Results: The SUB has held 33 monthly meetings with 52 university substance use research teams, all unanimously approved by members to attend. Members identified benefits to participating in the SUB, felt researchers treated them as experts, and supported other institutions establishing similar boards. Members also described feelings of belonging and empowerment, and valued being viewed as experts. Conclusion: To our knowledge, the SUB is one of the first CABs comprised of PWLE housed at a university that is not tied to a specific study or project. The SUB's high retention rate and member feedback demonstrate the benefit of meaningfully involving PWLE throughout the research process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.