Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038714›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026

Perceptions of health research participation in rural and urban Pennsylvanians.

Jennifer B McCormick, Jennifer Mary Poger, Sandesh Bhandari, Courtney Whetzel, Angel Collie, Alyson G Eggleston, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Orfeu M Buxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer B McCormick *Department of Humanities, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-8180
Jennifer Mary Poger *Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3276-805X
Sandesh BhandariPenn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Courtney WhetzelPenn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Angel ColliePenn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3349-5541
Alyson G EgglestonPenn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1163-7444
Jennifer L KraschnewskiPenn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Orfeu M BuxtonPenn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-633X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Emerging evidence describes the experiences of individuals participating in health research, but insights into the barriers and motivations around research participation in rural communities are limited. We developed and administered a human-centered, evidence-informed survey to assess motivators and barriers to research participation among adults in Pennsylvania. Methods: The online survey captured differences between individuals with and without prior research participation and living in rural and urban settings. We hypothesized that individuals with prior research experience would report different motivators and barriers than those who had never participated in research. We also anticipated that rural and urban respondents would differ in their reported motivators and barriers to participation. Results: Participants (n = 284, 75% female, 63% urban, 73% with prior research) completed the survey in spring of 2025. Overall top motivators to research participation included a willingness to "contribute to knowledge and medicine," to "help others," to "make a difference," "because the research was personally important," and "financial compensation." Top barriers included an "inconvenient research site," "limited transportation access," and "time/work constraints." A variety of motivators and barriers differed by prior research experience. There were no significant differences between the proportion of rural and urban prior research participants who endorsed any of the motivators or barriers. Rural, non-research participants drew greater motivation from "family influence" and "volunteering commitment." Conclusion: The results of this work can inform the development of targeted strategies to improve research engagement, particularly among rural populations.

Indexed as

barriersengagementmotivatorsresearch participationRural

Identifiers

PMID42038714
PMCPMC13107071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.