ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
How to isolate the superior vena cava using balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation system: Standardized workflow and initial results.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardised superior vena cava isolation with a balloon-in-basket pulsed-field ablation catheter: feasibility and acute safety of two procedural workflows in 53 consecutive patients.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Article
- Successful isolation of arrhythmogenic superior vena cava via balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation: Overcoming phrenic nerve proximity.HeartRhythm case reports · 2026Article
- Transient phrenic nerve stunning during superior vena cava isolation after focal pulsed field ablation.HeartRhythm case reports · 2026Article
- Author's Reply to "Considerations on phrenic nerve and sinus node safety during superior vena cava isolation using a balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation system".Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Considerations on phrenic nerve and sinus node safety during superior vena cava isolation using a balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation system.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Does sex shape the biological footprint of balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation-guided pulmonary vein isolation? A biomarker analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Superior vena cava (SVC) is one of the most important non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but ablation at this site carries risks of phrenic nerve injury and sinus node dysfunction. Balloon-in-basket (BiB)-pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal system offering stable wall contact and simultaneous mapping, yet its use for SVC isolation has not been well established. Objective: This study described a standardized workflow and initial results of SVC isolation using the BiB-PFA system. Methods: We included patients who underwent de novo PV isolation and SVC isolation using the BiB-PFA system. SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow including electroanatomic mapping, phrenic nerve pacing, selective voltage adjustment (1800 or 1400 V), and systematic remapping. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and acute safety outcomes were evaluated. Results: A total of 10 patients (median age 78 years, 4 women, and 2 with paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. Acute PV isolation and SVC isolation were achieved in all patients. 1 patient developed transient sinus node arrest immediately after the first application for SVC, which resolved with isoprenaline without pacemaker implantation. No persistent sinus node dysfunction or phrenic nerve palsy occurred. Conclusion: We described a standardized, reproducible strategy for SVC isolation using the BiB-PFA system. In this initial experience, the strategy was feasible and safe, with acute success in all patients and only 1 transient adverse event. These findings suggest that the BiB-PFA system may represent a promising tool for adjunctive SVC ablation in AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.