ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Safety, performance, and remote programming utilization of an insertable cardiac monitor: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04732728 (LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor Remote Programming and Performance Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
LUX-Dx Insertable Cardiac Monitor Remote Programming and Performance Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are designed to record subcutaneous electrocardiographic data for the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias. Objective: The LUX-Dx PERFORM study evaluated the safety of the LUX-Dx ICM, the utilization of remote reprogramming, and the performance of the LUX-Dx arrhythmia detection algorithms. Methods: The study included 727 patients with multiple indications for an ICM including atrial fibrillation management, syncope, and cryptogenic stroke. The primary safety endpoint was evaluated via 30-day and 12-month ICM system-related complication-free rates. Device programming changes were quantified by type and impact on episode detections. A subset of 601 patients was enrolled in a 14-day Holter study to evaluate the performance of the ICM against a third-party extended Holter monitor patch. Results: ICM implants occurred in hospital (n = 547; 76%) and clinic settings (n = 170; 24%) with an extremely low 12-month complication rate (n = 3; 0.4%). Device reprogramming was performed on 184 patients (26%), with 82% of programming changes occurring remotely. Programming adjustments to reduce or enhance device detections led to an approximately 2-fold decrease or increase in monthly episodes, respectively. In the Holter substudy, the LUX-Dx identified 23 patients with atrial fibrillation episodes that were not detected by the extended Holter monitor and demonstrated 100% sensitivity for detecting pause episodes. Conclusion: Fewer than 1 in 200 patients had a complication within 1 year of ICM implant, and the LUX-Dx ICM demonstrated strong arrhythmia detection performance relative to an industry-standard patch monitor. Remote programming was frequently used, which may enhance detection and streamline data processing and care in the device clinic. Study Identifier: NCT04732728.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.