ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Acute hemodynamic effects of a novel algorithm for cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization: Results from the BIO|Adapt study.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A considerable proportion of patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prolonged QRS duration fail to respond adequately to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Suboptimal atrioventricular (AV) delay programming is a key factor leading to diminished response. Objective: This study aimed to acutely correlate aortic velocity time integral, LVEF, and QRS duration with 3 programming strategies in the postimplantation setting: AV delay automatically set by a novel CRT AutoAdapt algorithm, AV delay optimized by echocardiography, and standard ("in-box") programming. Methods: Under normal intrinsic AV conduction (<250 ms after atrial pacing), the CRT AutoAdapt algorithm automatically switches to left ventricular-only pacing and adapts the AV delay to 50%, 70% (default), or 90% of intrinsic AV conduction. In our study, 163 CRT-defibrillator recipients (mean age 69.2 ± 9.2 years; 32% female; LVEF 27.7% ± 6.6%; 76% with left bundle branch block) underwent echocardiographic and electrocardiographic assessments at prehospital discharge. Results: With the default 70% AV adaptation, the CRT AutoAdapt automatically set a similar AV delay (117.1 ± 23.9 ms) compared with echocardiography-guided optimization (118.3 ± 30.2 ms; Conclusion: Acute hemodynamic effects of CRT AutoAdapt and echocardiography-guided AV-delay optimization were similar, with equivalent cardiac performance. This device-based approach offers the potential advantage of continuous adaptation to changing physiological conditions without requiring resource-intensive in-office optimization procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.