ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Self-supervised contrastive learning enables robust electrocardiogram-based cardiac classification.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-supervised contrastive learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for learning generalizable representations from unlabeled data. In the context of electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, such pre-training can significantly enhance classification performance, especially when labeled data is scarce. Objective: We aimed to investigate and improve contrastive self-supervised learning techniques for ECGs by systematically combining recent methodological advances in augmentation design, contrastive loss formulation, and encoder architectures. Methods: We implemented a contrastive pre-training framework combining vectorcardiography (VCG)-based physiologically-inspired augmentations, interlead, intersegment, contrastive loss, and patient-aware positive sampling. In addition, we developed a dual-stream architecture, extending the TemporalNet model by processing grouped ECG leads independently. Pretraining was conducted on a large corpus of approximately 1 million unlabeled ECGs. We evaluated performance on 2 downstream classification tasks-low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and high serum potassium chloride-using various levels of labeled supervision (1%, 5%, 10%, 50%, and 100%). The pre-trained models were compared with the randomly initialized models under both frozen and finetuned conditions. Results: Contrastive pre-training consistently improved performance across all supervision levels. In low-label settings (1%-10% supervision), the pre-trained model achieved 3%-4% higher area under the receiver operator curve on the LVEF task and 5%-7% higher area under the receiver operator curve on the potassium chloride task compared with the baseline. The performance gap narrowed with increased supervision but remained favorable toward pre-trained models. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that contrastive pre-training can substantially enhance ECG classification, especially when labeled data is limited. By unifying and extending ideas from recent literature into a scalable framework trained on 1 million ECGs, we provide practical guidance and architectural innovations for building strong ECG foundation models applicable to a broad range of clinical prediction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.