ArticleHealthcare technology letters
Epidemic Forecasting via Hybrid Deep Learning With Unified Visibility and Temporal Graphs Under Stochastic Noise Modelling.
Article in Healthcare technology letters. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidemic forecasts are unreliable when surveillance data are noisy or incomplete and when underreporting and rapidly changing population behaviour distort observed incidence, degrading the stability of conventional statistical and deep-learning models. We aim to develop an interpretable, uncertainty-aware forecasting pipeline that remains robust under data corruption and is practical for real-time use. We convert COVID-19 incidence into multilayer temporal graphs: global cumulative counts are differenced to daily incidence, normalised, and segmented into overlapping 30-day windows; for each window, we build a visibility graph from the empirical series and a matched-length visibility graph from stochastic simulations (fractional Brownian motion and Lévy-type dynamics) to represent reporting and behavioural randomness. We fuse the graphs (weighted edge averaging), extract compact descriptors (mean degree, clustering coefficient, entropy) and train a lightweight regressor to predict the 7-day-ahead average incidence. On the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 dataset, the method outperforms ARIMA, LSTM and standard GCN baselines (MAE = 0.0558; RMSE = 0.0709). Stress tests with noise and missingness and ablations show that stochastic augmentation and graph fusion materially improve robustness, while a cloud-oriented deployment reduces inference time by >60% and memory usage by 35%, enabling low-latency monitoring for timely public-health decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.