ArticleClinical case reports2026
Vaginal Foreign Body Insertion in Adolescents Influenced by Social Media: A Three-Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body insertion into the vagina among adolescents, though uncommon, presents unique diagnostic and management challenges. In younger children, diagnosis is often challenging because they may be unable to recall or report foreign body insertion. In contrast, adolescents more frequently acknowledge insertion, making diagnosis comparatively less complex. Here, we discuss three cases of adolescents who inserted objects under the influence of social media content or emotional distress. Each patient reported persistent, nonspecific symptoms that led to delayed diagnosis. Ultrasound imaging and vaginoscopic evaluation under anesthesia were ultimately necessary for definitive identification and removal. Psychosocial assessment revealed underlying contributors such as sexual curiosity, low mood, and social media-driven behaviors. These cases underscore the importance of a high index of suspicion for unexplained genitourinary complaints, prompt multidimensional evaluation including vaginoscopy, and a comprehensive team approach incorporating gynecological, pediatrics, psychological, and family support. In the era of evolving digital media influences, clinicians should remain vigilant about psychosocial factors contributing to adolescent risk-taking behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.