ArticleSSM - health systems2026
Legitimacy-building to establish climate services in Uganda's health system: The role of digital health platform.
Article in SSM - health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Establishing climate services within health systems is increasingly recognized as essential for strengthening resilience in low- and middle-income countries, yet little is known about how such efforts gain legitimacy. This case study examines the early-stage establishment of climate services within Uganda's national health system through the DHIS2 digital health platform. Drawing on legitimacy theory and boundary object theory, we trace how actors mobilized pragmatic, moral, and emerging cognitive forms of legitimacy, and how the platform mediated these processes. We introduce the notion of digital health platforms as legitimacy infrastructure-socio-technical arrangements through which legitimacy is constructed, transferred, and normalized across institutional boundaries. The study identifies key legitimacy-building mechanisms, including co-creation practices that foster ownership, alignment with national policy priorities that secure institutional backing, and the use of trusted digital infrastructures that lower adoption barriers. By theorizing how platforms mediate cross-sectoral acceptance, the study contributes knowledge of why some innovations move from establishment toward institutionalization while others falter. For policymakers and implementers, this case-study underscores the importance of embedding co-creation, aligning innovations with national frameworks, and establishing cross-sector collaboration early in the establishment of climate services for health, particularly when anchored in existing health information infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.