Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038615›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026

EMERGE: Early antiMicrobial stEwaRdship for GEneral medicine patients-targeting inpatient intravenous therapy greater than 24 hours.

Sharmila Khumra, Ashmitha Thomas, Sara Vogrin, Adele Batrouney, Kate Lowe, Shayne Camilleri, Nicholas Jones, Jason A Trubiano, Satwik Motaganahalli, Gemma Reynolds

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sharmila KhumraDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3499-8652
Ashmitha ThomasDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1771-630X
Sara VogrinDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-9421
Adele BatrouneyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0946-2422
Kate LoweDepartment of Pharmacy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shayne CamilleriDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9285-7567
Nicholas JonesDepartment of General Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jason A TrubianoDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5111-6367
Satwik MotaganahalliDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6739-0424
Gemma ReynoldsDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9561-3592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Early review of intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy is central to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), however scalable models for general medical patients are limited. We evaluated a pharmacist-led digital intervention to optimize IV antimicrobial prescribing. Methods: A prospective, quasi-experimental before-and-after study was conducted between May 2022 to February 2023 across six general medicine units at a tertiary hospital. AMS recommendations were delivered electronically via Microsoft Teams®. Adult inpatients receiving IV antimicrobials for >24 hours were included, excluding those with COVID-19, under Infectious Diseases consultation or receiving palliative care. The primary outcome was median IV antimicrobial duration. Secondary outcomes included AMS recommendation type, recommendation acceptance, length of stay (LOS), 30-day infection-related readmission, IV therapy recommencement, and inpatient mortality. Antibacterial consumption was analyzed from July 2021 to through December 2024 to evaluate sustained impact. Results: Among 723 antimicrobial orders (474 treatment episodes in 458 patients), median IV duration was comparable between phases (intensive: 2.75 days; baseline: 3.00 days). LOS was shorter during the intensive phase compared to baseline (5.5 vs 7.6 days; Conclusions: The digital pharmacist-led AMS intervention did not reduce IV duration, likely reflecting strong baseline prescribing, but was associated with shorter LOS and a reduction in total antibacterial use. This program offered a scalable, sustainable alternative to resource-intensive face-to-face models.

Identifiers

PMID42038615
PMCPMC13104568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.