Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038603›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026

Management of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a United States-based multi-center survey.

Laila M Castellino, Christina G Rivera, Susan E Beekmann, Philip M Polgreen, Monica M Mahoney, Sara C Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laila M CastellinoThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3184-4850
Christina G RiveraMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-3264
Susan E BeekmannThe University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0278-506X
Philip M PolgreenThe University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Monica M MahoneyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5071-2159
Sara C KellerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9660-4367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programs continue to evolve with increases in multidisciplinary teams, complex oral antibiotics, long-acting injectable antimicrobials, patients with substance use disorder (SUD) and telehealth. We sought to examine how OPAT programs are currently structured and identify barriers to safe care. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants: Physician, pharmacist, and advanced practice providers (APP) Emerging Infections Network (EIN) members. Methods: A survey was conducted between February and March 2025 to assess OPAT structure, expansion to complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy (COpAT), and barriers to safe OPAT care. Results: Of 1639 EIN members, 622 (38%) responded; 75% reported an active role in OPAT. Oversight of patients on COpAT was reported by 59%, and mandatory ID consultation for OPAT by 59%. Eighty-one percent reported >75% of OPAT patients were followed by ID. Most patients received OPAT at home (78%) followed by post-acute care facilities. Outpatient and inpatient ID physicians were responsible for laboratory test monitoring (75% and 30% respectively), while 37% reported a multidisciplinary OPAT team and 32% reported non-specialists. Respondents cited inadequate support in data analysis, administration, information technology and financial support for clinical staff. Common challenges were lack of leadership awareness (51%), difficulty managing patients with SUD (50%) and timely access to laboratory test results (48%). Conclusions: ID physicians were commonly involved in OPAT care, with many programs expanding to COpAT. Several barriers to the safe delivery of OPAT remain, including lack of institutional support, reimbursement and poor communication between stakeholders.

Identifiers

PMID42038603
PMCPMC13104569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.