ArticleArchives of physiotherapy
How people with cancer experience the ethical dimensions of physiotherapy in cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative interview study.
Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer rehabilitation is increasingly recognized as a core component of cancer care, yet little is known about how people with cancer perceive its ethical dimensions. This study explored how patients experience autonomy, safety, equity, and relational care within physiotherapy-led cancer rehabilitation. Methods: We conducted a qualitative interview study using reflexive thematic analysis (RTA). Twenty adults with a previous cancer diagnosis who had received physiotherapy related to cancer rehabilitation within the past three years were purposively sampled to maximize variation in age, gender, diagnosis, stage, care setting, and geographical area. Interviews were conducted online, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed inductively from a constructionist, experiential perspective. Results: Five themes captured ethically salient aspects of rehabilitation experiences: (1) struggles for meaningful participation, where involvement in decisions was sometimes limited despite rhetoric of autonomy; (2) balancing safety and control, where professional caution was experienced as both protective and at times over-restrictive; (3) unequal access as systemic injustice, with geography, logistics, and poor information affecting access to services; (4) empathy and emotional presence, which fostered trust, dignity, and motivation; and (5) limits of standardized care, where rigid protocols and time pressure risked depersonalization unless offset by flexibility. Participants did not view rehabilitation as a merely technical intervention, but as an ethically charged practice shaped by everyday interactions, organizational contexts, and opportunities for agency. Conclusions: People with cancer experience rehabilitation as an ethical as well as clinical practice. Flexible, dialogic, and equitable models of care may better support dignity, participation, and shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.