Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42038552›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2026

Perioperative FLOT versus Definitive 50.4 Gy Chemoradiotherapy in Siewert II Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Sermin Dinc Sonusen, Zehra Sucuoglu Isleyen, Okan Aydin, Mert Erciyestepe, Abdullah Sakin, Necla Gurdal, Muslih Urun, Berrak Mermit Ercek, Mehmet Bilici, Halide Sena Gurbuz and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sermin Dinc SonusenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0003-0624-1462
Zehra Sucuoglu IsleyenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-8009
Okan AydinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9516-992X
Mert ErciyestepeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7590-6101
Abdullah SakinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2538-8569
Necla GurdalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5727-3436
Muslih UrunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9883-3398
Berrak Mermit ErcekDepartment of Medical Oncology, Van Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-5500
Mehmet BiliciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2850-6997
Halide Sena GurbuzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0005-7521-5537
Senar GunencDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8585-9524
Resit AkyelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-8693
Emir CelikDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8440-3082
Kayhan ErturkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-6800
Muhammed Mustafa AtciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1300-3695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal multimodal treatment for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma remains debated. While the ESOPEC trial supports perioperative FLOT, real-world evidence is limited, particularly for Siewert type II tumors. Aim: To compare survival and treatment outcomes of perioperative FLOT versus definitive-dose chemoradiotherapy in non-metastatic Siewert II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Methods: Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma was defined as tumors with an epicenter located between 1 cm above and 2 cm below the esophagogastric junction. We retrospectively identified patients with non-metastatic Siewert type II esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma treated between January 2015 and December 2024 at three tertiary cancer centers. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel and 50.4 Gy radiotherapy, delivered as definitive therapy or neoadjuvantly prior to planned surgery. Clinical characteristics, treatment delivery, pathological response, survival outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed. Results: Seventy patients were included (FLOT, n=50; concurrent chemoradiotherapy, n=20). Surgery was performed in 45/50 (90%) FLOT patients and 7/20 (35%) concurrent chemoradiotherapy patients, representing a major difference between treatment groups. Median follow-up was 53.7 months. Median overall survival was 43.0 months in the FLOT group and 48.6 months in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (p=0.498). Median event-free survival was 34.2 months and 35.0 months, respectively (p=0.548). No pathological complete response occurred in the FLOT group; one patient (14.3%) in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group achieved pathological complete response. Grade 3-4 toxicities were more frequent with FLOT (26% vs. 5%). Distant relapse was the predominant recurrence pattern in both groups. Conclusion: Despite a substantial difference in surgical resection rates between groups, perioperative FLOT and concurrent chemoradiotherapy showed comparable survival outcomes in this real-world cohort of patients with Siewert type II EGJ adenocarcinoma. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as treatment selection and baseline differences may have influenced outcomes. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient characteristics and clinical context.

Indexed as

adenocarcinomachemoradiotherapyesophagogastric junctionFLOTsiewert type II

Identifiers

PMID42038552
PMCPMC13109064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.