ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms for estimating reference evapotranspiration based on NASA POWER weather data: a case study in Nigeria.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Penman-Monteith (PM) method is recognized as the globally accepted approach for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo). However, its use is constrained in areas with limited or unavailable data. Predicting ETo using multiple support vector machine (SVM) kernels and decision tree (DT) ensembles with NASA POWER data is innovative, as previous SVM-based ETo prediction studies have relied primarily on linear kernels. This study aims to evaluate the performance of different machine learning (ML) models, specifically SVM and DT and their ensembles, using NASA Power data as input. For this purpose, ML models were trained using average values of the monthly climatic data (maximum and minimum air temperatures, relative humidity, and wind speed) from NASA POWER. ETo was used as the output variable and was calculated from ground-observed data using the PM method. The developed ML models underwent training and validation to determine ETo in areas with different weather conditions in Nigeria: Kano-dry weather, Onne-wet weather, and Ibadan-moderate weather. Thirty and 70 % of the data were used during training and validation, respectively. The SVMs used in this study include linear SVM, quadratic SVM, cubic SVM, fine Gaussian (FG) SVM, medium Gaussian (MG) SVM, and coarse Gaussian SVM. The decision trees include fine, medium, and coarse trees, along with their ensembles: bagged and boosted trees. The model performance was evaluated using various error metrics. The FG SVM model exhibited the most accurate and precise estimation of ETo, with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.38 and 0.599 mm during the training and testing phases, respectively. Additionally, the coefficient of determination (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.